Pandahut Network Forums

Now I know this might not even be possible but what if you took all four kit pvp servers, shut them down, then merged them into a super server where there are 96 people on at a time. Now I know this will be laggy because of server lag, but what if you took the cost of running those four servers and input them into one for a better server? No, that won't help with fps lag but, idk, I just think it would be cool to have 4x more people on a map that is 4x bigger.
As far as I know fps lag wouldn't get affected too much because it isnt your computer's job to render the whole size of one of the huge maps, you only need to render a small chunk of the buildables, I may be wrong, tell me what you think.

I don't know how many players a server can hold. I have been told 48 and I have been told there is no maximum I don't know which is true. However, I do know that if the server exceeds a max of 24 players it will no longer show up on the server list. Also, I think a server with 90 players would be extremely laggy, Idk though.

Sorry dumb idea.

No offense.

Sorry dumb idea.

No offense.

I have to agree with this statement, on Washington, kitpvp servers when (20/24) players, is just enough pvp imo.

Sorry dumb idea.

No offense.

I have to agree with this statement, on Washington, kitpvp servers when (20/24) players, is just enough pvp imo.

Agreed.

Unturned is limited and has trouble with a lot of players, it would also most likely cause lag for the people playing FPS wise.

I played on a Chinese server with almost a 100 players and I gotta say, it was a lot of fun. Wasn't much lag.

Rust Royale has a capacity of 80 players.

+1 A test super server to see if it works couldn’t hurt also any servers above 24 slots dont show up in the server list so you would have to join through the ip

Ok i did say in the post do it on one of the large maps not the smaller ones, obviously it would be cancer on Washington to have 96 people crowded in such a small place.