Page 1 of 1

Groups have to be defined. Right now I cant tell.

Unread postPosted:February 19th, 2016, 4:19 pm
by EricPrince811
There is no way to define who on whos team. Right now I am so frustrated on knowing who to shoot without committing KOS.

Earlier my gunstore was raided and I never saw anyone call raid in chat. However Managed to kill Velocity and then saw in chat someone called raid over. I ran back into my store and saw peanut butter come inside. I thought the raid was done so I ended up getting shot seconds later. The bottom line is there is no way of telling who is with who. This makes it impossible and makes it a pardon to KOS anyone near that area. There needs to be something done or anyone walking by your area is allowed to be KOS during a raid.

Re: Groups have to be defined. Right now I cant tell.

Unread postPosted:February 19th, 2016, 4:26 pm
by Nathanimal
I also have a complaint with grouping. I was robbed earlier and I was alone, against 3 bandits, although not impossible to kill them all, I still died and lost all my things. Its hard to RP when I am being robbed by someone, I kill them, and then someone in the treeline shoots me. How am I supposed to do anything against that? And how am I supposed to know who is with who? Considering you have to get VERY close to people to read the name they have. If grouping is going to be allowed on the server I think that There should be a limit to how many people are in the group, and they all have to be present when there is robberies/arrests. Some groups, not mentioning any names, have gotten to the point where they are almost running the server, due to the fact there are 10+ members in said group. This is just my opinion on the situation. Not sure if anything can be done about it. But I figured I would put my opinion down to back Eric up.

Re: Groups have to be defined. Right now I cant tell.

Unread postPosted:February 19th, 2016, 11:42 pm
by Cornflake
In my honesty. They should make a "Group Raiding" rule to where if someone was going to raid a business with more then 1/2 people. They need to have a group name in there name.

Re: Groups have to be defined. Right now I cant tell.

Unread postPosted:February 22nd, 2016, 4:18 pm
by George
I completely agree because it is very hard to tell who is on what side and when i am raiding i want things to go as they should; not someone else ruining the fun of raiding and being raided

Re: Groups have to be defined. Right now I cant tell.

Unread postPosted:February 22nd, 2016, 4:41 pm
by Arashi_tlk
Well not everyone can have a group name. For instance, their name is long already, it just makes it nearly impossible for them to type in chat with only having two lines to type a message. Another would be if two people that are strangers and decide to team up, a rule to have group names would require them to leave and change their name to be running together. (which can be problematic when the server's full and they don't want their spot taken just to change a name)

I will agree, if friends know they are gonna play together, it would help to know they are together.

As for the robbing situations, that's a bit of a pain in the ass. If you're being robbed and you manage to fend off the robber but his buddy is in the treeline with a sniper aimed right at you. Or hell, some guy far off that's just about out of range of a sniper (200m/250m+). I get backing up a buddy, but that makes it nearly impossible to defend yourself from being robbed and surviving. It's nearly perfect to rob that way if it's allowed. (which there isn't a rule against it) I do feel there should be a limit to how far you can be away from your friend if they're robbing or being robbed.

There was one time where a couple of my friends were all robbing one single guy near the South Seattle woods. Little did we know, he had a friend with a sniper rifle in the tall white building in the middle of Seattle (just over 200m away) and he told his friend he was being robbed and his friend started shooting at us. At the time, we didn't even know where the shot came from, nor did we see the guy.

I get we can't put rules on everything, so no telling if there will be a rule saying all parties involved in a robbery, or preventing a robbery, have to be seen, and in a reasonable range, say 20-30m range max to be apart of it. (no watch eye, sniper cover) Same goes for arresting.