[Miku]

This idea if voted would disallow people to claim buildings for the sole intent of claiming them and selling them for a profit.

Builders and such can still fully build houses and such and sell them, but you MUST fully furnish the house or building before you sell it.

THIS WOULD BECOME A RULE, NOT A LAW!

[Abstract Shadow]

YES YES YES YES PLEASE. Also in the rules it is stated that you can only claim two buildings, a base and a shop. Still, I feel that this would be a big "Fuck you!" to those who only want profit and scramble at the start of every wipe to claim all the buildings.

[Yoseph]

+1
When people own all of one apartment, it is just straight up unfair because they can charge however much they want.

[ACerealBowl]

-1 just seems quite silly. If your going to sell something why would you need to furnish it? Just seems silly to me; I don’t see any point to it. Still keep up with the ideas

[Abstract Shadow]

-1 just seems quite silly. If your going to sell something why would you need to furnish it? Just seems silly to me; I don’t see any point to it. Still keep up with the ideas

That's not the point of this rule. The point of the rule is to stop people from claiming every apartment and selling it only for profit. It's different if you built a base and were trying to sell that. Even if it's a prebuilt base that you're trying to sell it's aimed towards those who block off apartments purely to sell them, not bases that they worked hard on or were previously lived in.

[TrippL]

This idea if voted would disallow people to claim buildings for the sole intent of claiming them and selling them for a profit.

Builders and such can still fully build houses and such and sell them, but you MUST fully furnish the house or building before you sell it.

THIS WOULD BECOME A RULE, NOT A LAW!

-1

having people sell shops/bases is a win/win situation. the builder gets payed for selling the property and the shop owner makes profit off selling goods/services in that desired location from being a high-traffic area. The only people who would want this rule is people who don't have enough money to purchase the shop/base or they think the price is to high for them to make a profit. They should just make their shop farther away or buy a cheaper shop. If all else fails, just raid it.

But there is one thing that I think they should add to the rules even though It almost never happens. The rules should state that you cannot own more than"x" amount of buildings in a town. I think a good number would be 2 or 3 and apartment buildings would count as 1 building. Having someone owning an excessive amount of property can harm RP.

and last thing, don't put anything about furnishing, that's just dumb.

[wonslowcar]

I think it'd be cool to be able to walk into a place, say it looks ok for a house, and fortify it instead of paying 1000 dollars for a tiny place w/ a one slot garage at a wipe.
Note: this is targetted on Pablo cuz he claimed all buildings in alberton at the reset so he could sell all of them

[Abstract Shadow]

This idea if voted would disallow people to claim buildings for the sole intent of claiming them and selling them for a profit.

Builders and such can still fully build houses and such and sell them, but you MUST fully furnish the house or building before you sell it.

THIS WOULD BECOME A RULE, NOT A LAW!

-1

having people sell shops/bases is a win/win situation. the builder gets payed for selling the property and the shop owner makes profit off selling goods/services in that desired location from being a high-traffic area. The only people who would want this rule is people who don't have enough money to purchase the shop/base or they think the price is to high for them to make a profit. They should just make their shop farther away or buy a cheaper shop. If all else fails, just raid it.

But there is one thing that I think they should add to the rules even though It almost never happens. The rules should state that you cannot own more than"x" amount of buildings in a town. I think a good number would be 2 or 3 and apartment buildings would count as 1 building. Having someone owning an excessive amount of property can harm RP.

and last thing, don't put anything about furnishing, that's just dumb.

The rules state that players may only own one base and one shop, so two buildings total.

[Miku]

This idea if voted would disallow people to claim buildings for the sole intent of claiming them and selling them for a profit.

Builders and such can still fully build houses and such and sell them, but you MUST fully furnish the house or building before you sell it.

THIS WOULD BECOME A RULE, NOT A LAW!

-1

having people sell shops/bases is a win/win situation. the builder gets payed for selling the property and the shop owner makes profit off selling goods/services in that desired location from being a high-traffic area. The only people who would want this rule is people who don't have enough money to purchase the shop/base or they think the price is to high for them to make a profit. They should just make their shop farther away or buy a cheaper shop. If all else fails, just raid it.

But there is one thing that I think they should add to the rules even though It almost never happens. The rules should state that you cannot own more than"x" amount of buildings in a town. I think a good number would be 2 or 3 and apartment buildings would count as 1 building. Having someone owning an excessive amount of property can harm RP.

and last thing, don't put anything about furnishing, that's just dumb.

It's not about building. This is just to stop people from barricading up a place and claiming it as their own, just to flip it and sell it for cash.

People get on right after wipes just to claim a bunch of buildings in hot-spots and turn around and sell them for money whilst doing nothing for them.

[xDreamLand]

Wow! Crazy idea +1