[BannedHammer]

I personally think they are breaking physics and should be bannable. As I could literally build a tower on top of my APC and place a bed on top. After that I'll just umbrella down on to any base I so wish to raid. In the air or not. So please, please, please... make Raid Vehicles against the rules.

[Tublo]

I second this. It shouldn't be a long ban though. Maybe half a day?

[The Realist]

I second this. It shouldn't be a long ban though. Maybe half a day?

No, I would do it exponentially like 2 hours, 4, 8, etc.

[Tublo]

I second this. It shouldn't be a long ban though. Maybe half a day?

No, I would do it exponentially like 2 hours, 4, 8, etc.

The length should be based of intent. If that player has called raid recently then they should have a longer ban.

[Mr. Lost Sympathy]

If we have to follow your logic of building on top of surfaces in order to climb up your ladder or whatever you build and then jump off it so you can get on the base you want to raid...well...WHY ONLY CARS?

If we take the car as a "surface" which you can build upon, then why do you think only cars are illegal. The "car" is taken as a "ground" you build your totally unrealistic ladder to Heaven. The real fucking question is, why the hell do you think I need a car for example? Like, I can make a ladder or bridge with planks on top of a car, but I can make that same shit ladder or bridge on the ground. I step with my two feet on solid surface and begin building up. Even if you building ladders like that on cars so fucking what? Whats gonna happen? People will keep building them on the ground, not cars and will still use umbrellas to jump down. The only thing that a car might prove to be better is that you can drive it from base to base, instead of building a new ladder at each base. But on the other hand, thats pretty much a reason for a cop to stop your vehicle/staircase or whatever the fuck you've turned it in to and arrest you. "Eeeeyy staph rite der. Wuts dis shiet on yer vehicle?!" You wont change much if you ban cars like that.

Calm your shit m8

The biggest pro with making raid cars is that you can evade the claim flag mechanic.

[Arashi_tlk]

Calm your shit m8

The biggest pro with making raid cars is that you can evade the claim flag mechanic.

Death is always a little edgy when he doesn't like something.

But yes, it breaks physics. What car in the world can hold a structure that may or may not be straight up and down? All that weight. Going up a hill would make the structure break apart just from Gravity. Small little things are fine because it could be feasible, but a large ladder shooting straight up is just fantasy if you think that could happen in real life.

Unturned might not have physics, but on the RP server we did away with sky bases because of the fact it's just magically floating. So too should high structured vehicles. Two story's on a vehicle could be fine, seeing as they could claim it's reinforced and that could be plausible, but much higher than that, you'd have to have some serious welding fab going on in there.

[BannedHammer]

Calm your shit m8

The biggest pro with making raid cars is that you can evade the claim flag mechanic.

That is pretty much the point I was going for.. I made this post at what, 5 am or so? Tired, I was.

[RagnarosPower]

I'll just say this death:
With a "raid vehicle" you can go up any base.
With no raid vehicle you cant build up because of claim flags

Kapish?

[danzeman00]

Because with a tower you will have to build massively high to be able to umbrella on to it because of the faster falling.

[Arashi_tlk]

I get that, but why cant I just step away a bit of the claim flag's range and do the same thing without a car? lol

This would also mean you have to build it right next to the base, or rather right next to the edge of the claim flag, and this would mean the owner could see it coming. A raid vehicle not only breaks the laws of physics, but also gives you all the time in the world to build it than drive over and get inside within seconds. It's breaking the claim flag mechanic as well obviously, and previously stated.