[sneadera]

You realise that in all countries there is no net neutrality. It’s just mostly neutral. But not completely

[Miku]

This just in: FCC has decided to repeal the 2015 Open Internet Order with a 3-2 vote. So much for democracy.

Also...

Websites wouldn't just be blocked right away. That would make zero sense.

It's been done before. Before net neutrality came to Canada, this and this happened.

They had reasons to do so, with us, we are very small and not in competition of anyone with lots of cash.

[Miku]

I don't think you understand what NN is. Websites wouldn't just be blocked right away. That would make zero sense. ISP's would be allowed to slow down x companies connection in exchange for y's companys money.

We are in direct competition of no one that can afford to buy out ISP's.

NN is important and should be fought for, but it would not affect us really at all.

The only way it ever could is if ISP's slowed down the connection of everything but paying websites, which would probably be unlikely, they wouldn't get very much money from it, and it is not very advantageous.

But... he never said anything about websites being blocked right away or pandahut being affected by it.

I edited it out lol, he had "Save Pandahut" and something else in the title about Pandahut being in danger

[iMC]

You realise that in all countries there is no net neutrality. It’s just mostly neutral. But not completely

- The European Union has the Regulation on Open Internet Access (REGULATION (EU) 2015/2120).
- Canada has the Telecommunications Act of 1993 and the Telecom Regulatory Policy (CRTC 2017-104) Framework.
- Australia doesn't have, nor need, net neutrality. Telstra’s ADSL network has been open to competitors, keeping competition high and giving consumers a choice. Also the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission aren't total dicks have a pretty good track record in protecting consumers.
- India does not have any actual laws regarding net neutrality (yet), but the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India has recently ruled in favor of net neutrality.
- Brazil has the Brazilian Civil Rights Framework for the Internet (Law No 12.965).
- The Phillipines have the Magna Carta for Philippine Internet Freedom (Senate Bill No. 53).
- Chile has the General Law of Telecommunications and the Chilean Net Neutrality Law (Law Nº 20.453).

sorry doesnt interest me im not from the us...thank you

I'm not from the US either, but I'm probably going to be affected by this anyway, since most of the websites I go to are American-based. (yes, including PandaHut) That's why I'm here.

[Abstract Shadow]

I don't think you understand what NN is. Websites wouldn't just be blocked right away. That would make zero sense. ISP's would be allowed to slow down x companies connection in exchange for y's companys money.

We are in direct competition of no one that can afford to buy out ISP's.

NN is important and should be fought for, but it would not affect us really at all.

The only way it ever could is if ISP's slowed down the connection of everything but paying websites, which would probably be unlikely, they wouldn't get very much money from it, and it is not very advantageous.

But... he never said anything about websites being blocked right away or pandahut being affected by it.

I edited it out lol, he had "Save Pandahut" and something else in the title about Pandahut being in danger

Ah ok.

[The Duke II]

You realise that in all countries there is no net neutrality. It’s just mostly neutral. But not completely

- The European Union has the Regulation on Open Internet Access (REGULATION (EU) 2015/2120).
- Canada has the Telecommunications Act of 1993 and the Telecom Regulatory Policy (CRTC 2017-104) Framework.
- Australia doesn't have, nor need, net neutrality. Telstra’s ADSL network has been open to competitors, keeping competition high and giving consumers a choice. Also the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission aren't total dicks have a pretty good track record in protecting consumers.
- India does not have any actual laws regarding net neutrality (yet), but the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India has recently ruled in favor of net neutrality.
- Brazil has the Brazilian Civil Rights Framework for the Internet (Law No 12.965).
- The Phillipines have the Magna Carta for Philippine Internet Freedom (Senate Bill No. 53).
- Chile has the General Law of Telecommunications and the Chilean Net Neutrality Law (Law Nº 20.453).

sorry doesnt interest me im not from the us...thank you

I'm not from the US either, but I'm probably going to be affected by this anyway, since most of the websites I go to are American-based. (yes, including PandaHut) That's why I'm here.

They can’t be affected if your not from the us omg ...and that’s why I don’t care about net neutrality it’s the United States problem not mine so I couldn’t give a darn about it

[OldManEtwon]

I don't think you understand what NN is. Websites wouldn't just be blocked right away. That would make zero sense. ISP's would be allowed to slow down x companies connection in exchange for y's companys money.

We are in direct competition of no one that can afford to buy out ISP's.

NN is important and should be fought for, but it would not affect us really at all.

The only way it ever could is if ISP's slowed down the connection of everything but paying websites, which would probably be unlikely, they wouldn't get very much money from it, and it is not very advantageous.

ISP's can block those who do not support them though. So because you do not have Comcast they block you. Is what I believe other people are trying to say because that makes more sense to me. And for those who's ISP's want to set up package's for your internet usage it can effect drastically.